NASA, America’s Space organization, asked the United States Navy recently if they would be willing to shoot down a defunct spy satellite expected to re-enter the Earth’s atmosphere at the beginning of March. Since this was first reported there have been concerns as to why the President and his administration have opted to have the satellite shot down instead of letting it merely fall to the ground. There have been two theories presented, the official theory by the administration and the unofficial.
The official story is that the Satellite is carrying a toxic fuel, which would kill any humans near the crash site. The name of the fuel carried by this wayward satellite is called hydrazine, which is also called diamine. However, scientists are reluctant to accept this theory put forth by the President’s administration. Rather, they would like to suggest (as would other countries) this is an excuse by the United States to test Anti-Satellite technology, much like what the Chinese did a few years ago with a “weather satellite.” Both of these theories are plausible but lets face it, the hydrazine theory is kind of laughable and the Anti-Satellite technology is plausible but the U.S. wouldn’t go to such length to warn other countries.
Thus I would like to suggest another theory is to why the United States wants to shoot down a wayward satellite. Let’s look at the the type of satellite this happens to be: it is a SPY satellite! Why would the United States want to shoot down a satellite that is reentering the Earth’s atmosphere? Because they don’t want potential enemies to retrieve any of the technology or try and retrieve information from it! This satellite is scheduled to fall to Earth in the North Pacific, the hunting grounds of certain Slavic and Asian unfriendly countries.
thanks much, bro